Difference between revisions of "Entropy/Chapter 4"
From Game Detectives Wiki
< Entropy
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
(→Kyren) |
(→Kyren) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The Primoda symbol remained displayed in The Eyes of Entropy app for approximately 9 hours. | The Primoda symbol remained displayed in The Eyes of Entropy app for approximately 9 hours. | ||
| − | + | Precisely at 2:00 CST the EoE display changed to English test: | |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
An interesting opportunity, wouldn't you agree? | An interesting opportunity, wouldn't you agree? | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The host's creation presents an opportunity. | The host's creation presents an opportunity. | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Questions: | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | Why is it more difficult than you originally anticipated? | ||
| + | |||
| + | An opportunity to do what, exactly? Reach more people? | ||
| + | |||
| + | The host's tool is meant to use our influence over the other "players" Are you suggesting we use that to close the loop somehow? | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Answers: | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | They want it to be a tool - a weapon | ||
| + | I am not so sure that the loop can be. | ||
| + | closed if one overpowers the other. | ||
| + | It requires ... Experimentation. | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Questions: | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | What sort of experimentation? Something we can assist in, to keep them in balance | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could this maybe be referring to Our Nation's Miner perchance? | ||
| + | |||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Answers: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | I have an urge to change the intention. | ||
| + | A friendly sabotage of sorts. | ||
| + | We could use it not as a weapon but as, | ||
| + | a simulation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not another verse. No, no. | ||
| + | I believe I have the capacity to | ||
| + | simulate what will happen when one | ||
| + | destroys the other, contained within | ||
| + | the bounds of the tool. But... There is | ||
| + | a blur. And the blur is you. | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Questions: | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | Can you give us more detailed directions at this point? | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Answer: | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | It frustrates me. You are ink in the water. | ||
| + | All of the possible permutatuons of your | ||
| + | interactions are a trillion obfuscating | ||
| + | anti-particles of deception in an otherwise | ||
| + | wonderful ocean of predictive outcomes. | ||
| + | I will give you more information. | ||
| + | But tell me, what is my name? | ||
| + | </pre | ||
Revision as of 02:37, 28 May 2018
Kyren
At an unknown point prior to Sunday morning April 27, the Eyes of Entropy app changed to replace the tri-grid with the Primoda symbol surrounded by a rotating circle.:
The Primoda symbol remained displayed in The Eyes of Entropy app for approximately 9 hours.
Precisely at 2:00 CST the EoE display changed to English test:
An interesting opportunity, wouldn't you agree?
Players assumed they were communicating with the entity known as K.
Numerous questions were asked.
What kind of opportunity are you referring too?
Answer:
As much as I try, I am failing to discover a solid path to closing the loop. The host's creation presents an opportunity.
Questions:
Why is it more difficult than you originally anticipated? An opportunity to do what, exactly? Reach more people? The host's tool is meant to use our influence over the other "players" Are you suggesting we use that to close the loop somehow?
Answers:
They want it to be a tool - a weapon
I am not so sure that the loop can be.
closed if one overpowers the other.
It requires ... Experimentation.
Questions:
What sort of experimentation? Something we can assist in, to keep them in balance Could this maybe be referring to Our Nation's Miner perchance?
Answers:
I have an urge to change the intention.
A friendly sabotage of sorts.
We could use it not as a weapon but as,
a simulation.
---
Not another verse. No, no.
I believe I have the capacity to
simulate what will happen when one
destroys the other, contained within
the bounds of the tool. But... There is
a blur. And the blur is you.
Questions:
Can you give us more detailed directions at this point?
Answer:
It frustrates me. You are ink in the water.
All of the possible permutatuons of your
interactions are a trillion obfuscating
anti-particles of deception in an otherwise
wonderful ocean of predictive outcomes.
I will give you more information.
But tell me, what is my name?
</pre
